Tags: cisco, company, directions, inmy, inside, location, locations, nat, outside, overload, software

NAT Overload both directions

On Software » Cisco

2,027 words with 1 Comments; publish: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:00:00 GMT; (40062.01, « »)

I am trying to do NAT overload both directions between two locations in

my company.

One location being inside and one being outside.

I can do the overload on the ethernet interface going from inside to

outside.

I seem to have to use a pool to go from outside to inside.

When I set this up I wanted to hide everything behind a single IP

address pool, but seems it only lets one client on the outside to use a

single IP in the pool at a time and not do PAT.

I thought I had this working in another location I used to work at but

been a while and can not remember.

Is this possible ? another way to do it ?

Can I have two interfaces be inside and overload between them ?

Any sugestions would be greatful.

Thanks.

MC

All Comments

Leave a comment...

  • 1 Comments
    • Yes, it is possible. Take a look at this cisco article:

      http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/...093f30 .shtml

      "MC" <mwclarke1.cisco.itags.org.yahoo.com> wrote in message

      news:VVwcf.9892$kd.8750.cisco.itags.org.bignews4.bellsouth.net...

      >I am trying to do NAT overload both directions between two locations in my

      >company.

      > One location being inside and one being outside.

      > I can do the overload on the ethernet interface going from inside to

      > outside.

      > I seem to have to use a pool to go from outside to inside.

      > When I set this up I wanted to hide everything behind a single IP address

      > pool, but seems it only lets one client on the outside to use a single IP

      > in the pool at a time and not do PAT.

      > I thought I had this working in another location I used to work at but

      > been a while and can not remember.

      > Is this possible ? another way to do it ?

      > Can I have two interfaces be inside and overload between them ?

      > Any sugestions would be greatful.

      > Thanks.

      > MC

      #1; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:01:00 GMT